Всего найдено: 2

Coronary angioplasty in potential recipients of donors hearts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25512/DIR.2007.01.3.09

For quoting:
Mironkov A.V., Pokatilov A.A., Ryadovoy I.G., Ostroumov E.N., Chestukhin V.V. "Coronary angioplasty in potential recipients of donors hearts". Journal Diagnostic & interventional radiology. 2007; 1(3); 66-74.

authors:

Mironkov A.V.

Pokatilov A.A.

Ryadovoy I.G.

Ostroumov E.N.

Chestukhin V.V.

keywords:

ischemic cardiomyopathy

percutaneous coronary interventions

ECG-gated SPECT

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to evaluate results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) - potential candidates for heart transplantation. The study included 37 patients with ICMP. All the patients before PCI and within the 7 days after it undergo ec-hocardiography and ECG-gated SPECT. The amount of irreversibly damaged myocardium of the left ventricle (LV) was about 50 % of its volume. In these patients ECG-gated SPECT did not show sufficient amount of the viable myocardium, capable to restore the heart function after revascularization. The main result of intervention was increase in survival rate of patients with ICMP within 4 years of observation in comparison with traditional methods of conservative therapy. The first clinical effect of PCI was disappearance or reduction of dyspnea, noted in the majority of the patients. These changes had been confirmed by improvement of a functional class of patients (NYHA class score increase to 3,2±0,5 from 1,7+65; p=0,007) and increase of tolerance to physical excersise. Positive changes of a clinical condition after PCI have taken place due to decrease in rigidity of LV myocardium: It became apparent due to decrease of LV end-diastolic pressure (35,7+9,3 vs. 23,5+9,9 Hg mm; p=0,04) and pressure in pulmonary artery (44+1 2 vs. 33+7 Hg mm; p=0,03). No changes of LV volumes and ejection fraction values in the given category of patients were seen.

Reference

1. Трансплантология. Руководство. Под ред. акад. В.И. Шумакова. М.: «ООО Медицинское информационное агентство». 2006.

2. Allman K.C., Shaw L.J., Hachamovitch R., Udelson J.E. Myocardial Viability Testing and Impact of Revascularization on Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis. J.Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002; 39 (7): 1151-1158.

3. Sciagra R., Leoncini M. Gated single-photon emission computed tomography. The present-day «one-stop-shop» for cardiac imaging. The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine. 2005; 49: 19-29.

4. Гуреев СВ. Аортокоронарное шунтирование и трансплантация аутологичных стволовых клеток костного мозга в лечении ишемической сердечной недостаточности. Дис. д-ра мед. наук. М., 2004.

5. Schinkel A., Poldermans D., Rizzello V, Vanoverschelde J., Elhendy A., Boersma E., Roelandt J., Bax J. Why do patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of viable myocardium not always recover in function after revascularization? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004; 127 (2): 385-390.

6. Беленков Ю.Н., Агеев Ф.Т., Мареев В.Ю. Динамик диастолического наполнения и диастолического резерва левого желудочка у больных с хронической сердечной недостаточностью при применении различных типов медикаментозного лечения: сравнительное допплер-эхокардиографическое исследование. Кардиология. 1996; 9: 38-50.

7. Grossman W Diastolic dysfunction in congestive heart failure. New Engl.J. Med. 1991; 325: 1557-1564.

8. GerdesA.M.,KellermanS.E.,MooreJ.A,MufflyK.E., Clark L.C., Reaves P.Y., Malec K.B., McKeown P.P., Schocken D.D. Structural remodeling of cardiac myocytes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1992; 6 (2): 426-430.

9. Beltrami C.A., Finato N., Rocco M., Feruglio G.A. Structural basis of end-stage failure in ischemic cardiomyopathy in humans. Circulation. 1994; 89 (1): 151-163.

Place of endovascular method in treatment of lesions to the left coronary artery stem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25512/DIR.2007.01.1.10

For quoting:
Chestukhin V.V., Mironkov B.L., Mironkov A.B., Ryadovoy I.G., Gontuar M.G., Parkhomenko M.V., Pokatilov A.A. "Place of endovascular method in treatment of lesions to the left coronary artery stem". Journal Diagnostic & interventional radiology. 2007; 1(1); 60-65.

authors:

Chestukhin V.V.

Mironkov B.L.

Mironkov A.B.

Ryadovoy I.G.

Gontuar M.G.

Parkhomenko M.V.

Pokatilov A.A.

keywords:

coronary heart disease

lesion of the left coronary artery stem

stenting

Abstract:

Lesions of the LCA stem are found in 2,5-4 % of patients with coronary heart disease who endured coronography, and are accompanied by more severe symptomatology, higher morbidity and mortality rates, and difficulty of radical correction. According to the generally accepted guidelines, the operation of coronary artery bypass has up to now been a method of choice in treatment of the LCA stem. Nevertheless, endovascular methods of treatment for LCA stem lesions have relatively long been used, while implementation into clinical practice of drug-eluding stents has considerably improved the remote outcomes, which made it possible to consider LCA stem stenting as a real alternative to ACB. Hence, the problem concerning indications for and contraindications to LCA stem stenting remains unsolved today. We retrospectively analysed a total of 75 endovascular interventions on the LCA stem in 67 patients, with an isolated lesion of the LCA stem being found only in 7,4 % of the patients. The remaining subjects had lesions of the LCA stem on the background of a multivascular lesion of the coronary bed, including occlusion of the RCA observed in 16,4 % of cases. Successive revascularization was performed in 98,64 % of cases, with no lethal outcomes. One patient required urgent ACB due to development of occluding dissection of the circumflex branch. Complications in the immediate postoperative period were observed in two patients and were represented by non-Q myocardial infarction and stroke. LCA stem stenting proved an efficient and safe method of treatment for coronary heart disease. A comparative analysis of the immediate results of LCA stem stenting and ACB revealed advantages of stenting, consisting in no lethal outcomes (in our series) and a lower short-term rate of postoperative complications.

Reference

1. Cohen МУ Cohn PF, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Diagnosis and prognosis of main left coronary artery obstructtion. Circulation 1972; 45 (Suppl 1): 57 - 65.

2. Gruentzig A.R. Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis. Lancet 1978; 1: 263.

3. O'Keefe JH, Harztler GO, Rutherford BD, et al. Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989; 64: 144 - 147.

4. Seung-Jung Park, MD, PHD, Young-Hak Kim, MD, Bong-Ki Lee, MD et al. Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Comparison With Bare Metal Stent Implantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005; 3 (45): 351-6.

5. Seung-Jung Park, Young-Hak Kim, Bong-Ki Lee, Seung-Whan Lee, Cheol Whan Lee, Myeong-Ki Hong, Jae-Joong Kim, Gary S. Mintz, MD, Seong-Wook Park. Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005; 45: 351-6.

6. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1244-9.

7. Arampatzis CA, Hoye A, Saia F, et al. Elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery disease: six-month angiographic follow-up and 1-year clinical outcome. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2004; 62: 292 - 6.

8. Joseph P. Ornato, Richard L. Page, Barbara Riegel etal. A Report of the American College of ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary. Circulation. 2006; 113: 156 - 175.

9. Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, Kaiser GC et al. Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main equivalent coronary artery disease: Long-term CASS experience. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2335-44.

10. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994; 344: 563 - 570.

11. Park S, Hong M, Lee CW, et al. Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1054 - 1060.

12. TakagiT, Stankovic G, Finci L, Toutouzas K, Chieffo A, Spanos У Liis-tro F, Briguori C, Corvaja N, Albero R, Sivieri G, Paloschi R, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation. 2002; 106: 698 - 702.

13. Sorin J. Brener, MD; Bruce W Lytle, MD; Ivan P. Casserly, MD; Jakob P. Schneider, RN; Eric J. Topol, MD; Michael S. Lauer, MD. Propensity Analysis of Long-Term Survival After Surgical or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and High-Risk Features. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2290 -2295.

14. Silvestri M, LefПvre T, Labrunie P, Khalife K, Bayet G, Morice MC, Bedossa M, Chmait A.. On behalf of the FLM registry investigators. The French registry of left main coronary artery treatment: Preliminary results. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003; 41: 45.

15. Brigouri C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, Airoldi F, et al. Elective versus provisional pumping in high-risk percutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am. Heart J. 2003; 145 (4): 700 - 7.

16. Бокерия Л. А., Алекян Б. Г., Бузиашвили Ю. И. и др